السبت، 26 يوليو، 2014


If we go back a few years back, we find that the march of events and developments in the region are going clearly in favor of Iran and its allies, and the blessing of the U.S. do not miss it the eye. It is not important what we hear from the American Antaryat against Tehran, but it is important what is happening on the ground of U.S. support indirectly to the growing Iranian influence in the Arab region. If we go back only to the few months leading up to the U.S. invasion of Iraq, we see clearly how the game began US-Iranian short, At that time, Washington was preparing for the London conference to unify the ranks of the famous Iraqi opposition, which will help in the process of invasion. Let us remember that the most important pillars of the opposition, which took part in the conference are members of the Iraqi parties that grew and grew up in Iran and Syria. In other words, we can say that the invasion began coordinating an Iranian-American and clear. No wonder, then, that American thinker George Friedman said at the time: "The most important event in the beginning of the twentieth century is an atheist and Iranian-American alliance." Iranians have confirmed that alliance when he said Iranian Vice President Ali Abtahi at the time: "If not for America, Iran was able to invade Iraq and Afghanistan." The witness from her family. 

Event and the U.S. invasion of Iraq, and America began to divide the country along sectarian lines blatantly led Bremer, prompting Shiite parties allied with Iran to the fore to begin the process of handing Iraq to Iran by the parties that I was born and grew and breastfed by Iranian breast. The elections were held more than once to win the men of Iran in Iraq, according to the blueprint. (It is true that the right of the majority in Iraq, whatever the power to win, but the winners did not have to win it not for American support and facilitation to them). And then ended the U.S. occupation of Iraq to become a vital area of Mesopotamia Iranian par excellence. And do not forget that Iran's allies in the region, often cheered for America out of Iraq is not a celebration of the liberation of Iraq, but falling in Iranian incitement, and then joining the bloc, which began its features are formed since the London conference, just before the U.S. invasion of Iraq shortly. This extends the bloc from Tehran through Baghdad Damascus Fberott. The Jordanian monarch dared then to be called "Shiite Crescent." 

Some might say that Iran has exploited the American stupidity in Iraq, are reaping the results to maximize strategic influence in the region. This is of course nonsense nonsense. Is it possible that the Americans did not know from the first moment that the invasion of Iraq and developments at the level produced by the sort of sectarian end the growing Iranian power? The mere power out of the hands of the Sunnis of Iraq after the fall of Saddam Hussein, and she went to Iran's allies was alone will lead to a change in the political map of the region in favor of Tehran. This is what actually happened. Is it possible that the Americans and British were absent with them the idea that the fall of Iraq under the cloak of Iran, in addition to the Iranian-Syrian Lebanese coalition will make a very important bloc in the region at the expense of the rest of the Arabs, especially the Gulf? I do not think that the Americans and the British, who have hundreds of research centers and memorized the combination of Streptococcus region and religious rote absent from them those very intuitive Fiqua. Was America to take over Iraq to Iran on a plate if they were actually hostile to? Remember that the Iranian influence in the region growing after the U.S. invasion of Iraq. 

I have the form of a U.S. withdrawal from Iraq, the final chapter of the crystallization of the Alliance of Iranian Iraqi-Syrian Lebanese. There is no doubt that it was the right of supporters to celebrate the alliance of such withdrawal, which they saw as a victory for their alliance in first class. It is clear that the alliance has now become stronger after the departure of the Americans. If the Americans want to help prevent the escalation of the new bloc to beat him in the bud, and what was left is growing to become a reality after their exit from Iraq. It is well known that the United States has worked for decades to prevent any rapprochement Syrian Iraqis, because the union Iraqi Syria would have been a major threat to its interests in the region politically, economically and militarily, it is enough to open countries to each other commercially and economically to form an economic zone powerful in the region. He told me personally, Uday Saddam Hussein before the invasion, when I met him shortly "America warned us more than once that the rapprochement with Syria is a red line." I do not know if the man justifies the bitter struggle with the Syrian Baath, or that he was telling the truth. 

Based on the American position rejecting any blocs in the region, but his blessing, Is it possible that America which were not accepted once the cooperation of Iraqi Syrian accept now swear by the largest includes Iran, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon were it not blessed by the alliance, and you want what you want out of it? Crazy tells the sane and heard. Not constitute NATO's new regional superpower threatens many, including other Arabs? Did not allude to the Syrian regime that he is ready to give up Arab support against the alliance with its partners in the alliance mentioned? Pain turn commercially and economically to the Iraq-Iran space to compensate for the economic losses suffered by the Arab and international sanctions recent him? So how do we believe that America wants to topple the Syrian regime if it had turned a blind eye originally from Syria alliance, which fall under its banner, and constitute one of the most important pillars? Is it possible that America will allow the fall of the Syrian regime, which is articulated in the episode the new bloc? If the regime fell, the Alliance of Iranian Iraqi-Syrian Lebanese collapse, especially that Syria constitutes the lifeblood of Hezbollah. Had collapsed system to Iraq was also influenced a lot, especially since Syria as a joint or focal point between Iran, Iraq and Lebanon. Is it possible for the Americans, who turned a blind eye to a growing alliance mentioned to agree now on the fall of the most important pillars, namely the Syrian regime? 


There are two things if one can deny the theory that America wants to Iranian influence in the region that is growing with its partners in order to balance the weight of the Sunni. First, if Israel had hit the Iranian nuclear reactor, and the second if America has worked to bring down the Syrian regime actually. Unless and until either of these two things, it means that the Arab region is changing in favor of Iran and its allies, and the hidden blessing of Uncle Sam. But not out of the plot nor of the door that the West would prefer Iran to the Arabs as it is clearly a Western plot to create a balance in the region between Sunni and Shiite poles to his own advantage. In other words, the West does not want to put all their eggs in the basket of Sunni, this is better to have him playing on Tktlan Tnaqdhathma and Asraathma to what God wills. And do not forget that Iran has become the West's playing the role of the Scarecrow or second enemy of the Arabs in the region after Israel, which relieves pressure on the Jewish state, and this in itself is turning Astrteja America must keep it to the brim. 

0 التعليقات:

إرسال تعليق

التُصنُيُفاتُ

Unordered List

أعلانكً

المًشاركُاتُ

أخٌرُ المُشاُركاُتُ

ضعُ أعلاتكُ هناُ

Text Widget