السبت، 26 يوليو، 2014




Proof of Iran as part of a fact sagging for the «Arab Spring», part can not be ignored, it is difficult to find a single hole drilled this spring, but we find «the Islamic Republic» in its bottom (Syria, Yemen, Bahrain, Iraq, and Egypt in large part of its political crisis ... etc.). Indeed, it was not the Declaration of Iranian leaders, the beginning, that the «Arab Spring», especially in the course of Egypt, is a stretch for sure for «revolution», but proof of Qaria Iran in what will happen to the Arabs later, particularly in Iraq and Syria, though «Liberation» Palestine may like the main entrance of her burrow pits before falling spring. But the question of how could Iran, and this force, to announce the «Islamic Spring», in fact, to announce to contribute to the destruction, then what can be captured from two angles superpowers: first, the issue of fluidity between the state and the community in Iran, which means the fluidity incursion Iranian any geopolitical see an Arab playground and religiously vital to her, as discussed in this quick fast; and second, in terms of continuing to fall Arab state, originally meager. 
But, the beginning, there is a point perhaps it is important to record the margin related to the depth of the disasters and the rise of fundamentalist Levantine, Iranian him and Arab: between fundamentalist Sunni fundamentalist Shiite, to look at the political system, there is a separation of important between them and dwell behind many of these fundamentalists today: the former, fundamentalist Sunni, lasting probably the state (and we stress the word probably) as an Islamic state, which Aaischha then I lost, and therefore the state missed, that existed then have been uprooted by the «Jews and Crusaders» (though this fundamentalist historically has been a concept of political for «State Beatitudes »the opposite of its legitimacy, but it is believed, however, that Ayesh something of State); while the second, the fundamentalist Shiite, the workers live with an Islamic state in which factor is missing originally, did not shape his concept of the political state, but the« margin of the central state »not in her lap or from inside the pillars; which led Shiite political ideology that Taattaba concept in political and state Bmikanezmat state« opposition »always, no mechanisms of the central state, any state against - Central. 
What this means that any political system will take the Shiite arises Ddia character, character troublemaker, if we may use this description. In other words, if there Ddiat Sunni fundamentalist centralized inside the Sunni, he is also, there is what awaits this spot EXISTS a probability do Ddiat statist than on the sidelines of the center, Ddiat not function unless the opposition, in addition to the arguments of the representation of what he thinks he right usurped by system or the political systems of the center. And we note that Iran's policy in the Eastern region under the pretext of exporting the Islamic revolution since the founding of the Republic of Khomeinite and what are its functions opposition, antibody, of course, starting with the liberation of Palestine «Islamic» Sunni and Shiite, and not the end in Iraq, Lebanon and Syria ... etc.. This is what was his results in the Shiite fundamentalists present and incursion in the rear of the other antibody Sunni fundamentalism.
From here, the one important reason in this concavity Iranian objects in Arab political sag is the cultural, political and religious Iranian himself at home. Can not lose sight of the confusion experienced by the Iranian space as well as in relation to where the borders of the state and where it ends. If this is not a done deal politically it to the same extent, from the perspective of a parallel, it is not a foregone conclusion religiously. In both cases, if the wound fundamentalist Arab state is embodied in a matter of torn between illegitimacy lives with and legitimacy sought by Mkhialaa (see «fundamentalist and wounding State» life, June 15, 2014), Valosola Iranian suffering from this crisis as well, but it adds to it complexity of historical, religious / sectarian and political, of the limits of Khomeinite Republic on the one hand, and the relationship between the West and Iran problematic region of the ocean or the Arab areas, a relationship which was originally a historic crisis, on the other hand. 
Fluidity at the border between the state and the community means Mauaa jump beyond the border and get into the limits and the limits of invention ... etc.; And, of course, the Orient is a natural playground for this jump. 
In Iran, there is, indeed, the clarity with regard to where the dream begins and where it ends Iran, where the state begins and where it ends Sect. This meant according to the path of permanence in the Arab flabby enduring harvest Iran from the depth of the devastation in the Arab region more than an Arab, where the policy is that wherever there are Shia or Shiite shrines and effects, there is inevitably having to Iran! And that under the pretext of its representation of the House of Shiite and protect it from the «enemy» Almitrbes them (and even this representation is not limited to this, but extends the stroke of Mkhial and pen, as in a dream Khomeini, to the representation of the Muslim world); not forget that hazy dream this fall in Osha Almkhiala hazy concept of identity in Iran (politically and nationally Persian and Shiite religious). 
Thus, between the devastation and desertification Arab, on the one hand, and the concavity of Iran in this desertification, on the other hand, there is always a factor the absence of the boundary between state and religion / sect, which constitutes the Iran branch golden in the extension in any patch intersect with it also the issue of the absence of a working state (Lebanon important historical example of this intersection factor in the absence of the state). 
Thus, from this angle, it is possible to read what it means advertising the Iranian «Islamic Spring» being the gateway to sabotage the spring; But, at the same time, this is not advertising, but to fortify the gates of Tehran Mvaalath, as long as the ruling political class feels that it has completed its mission in the revolution and ended History then! But, historically, as long as Iran is an integral part of the Eastern Alastbdadiat, the doors are not immune in any moment of the potential of the historic Railway change, and perhaps not even immune from railway vandalism that contribute in the Mashreq countries.

0 التعليقات:

إرسال تعليق

التُصنُيُفاتُ

Unordered List

أعلانكً

المًشاركُاتُ

أخٌرُ المُشاُركاُتُ

ضعُ أعلاتكُ هناُ

Text Widget